Yes, doing serious family tree research can result
in some disappointment. I had one of those last night. Readers of this
blog may recall my three posts titled “We’re All Cousins” which talked
about common ancestors I had found between
the family trees of my Father, my Wife and my Mother. I was
particularly enthusiastic about finding a connection between my Dad’s
and my Mom’s families (http://danegenealogy. blogspot.com/2012/10/were-all- cousins-part-3.html)
since it had always felt, since I was a kid, that those families were
so different from each other and that a crossover between their family
lines was unlikely.
Well, at least for now, I have to grudgingly accept
that the lines leading to the common ancestor I’d found for my Mom and
Dad have turned out to be incorrect. As background, I have recently
become a convert to the methods of
http://www.WikiTree.com,
specifically that every person in my family tree should have one and
only one WikiTree profile and that each profile should contain sources
for the dates, locations and family relationships they
contain. If I find no profile on the WikiTree One World Tree for my
ancestor or relative, I add one. If I do find one there, I update it
with sources if it isn’t already updated (and many of them need
updating). The site is a Wiki, so I can do that and
I’ve gotten a LOT better at sourcing and updating in the three months
I’ve been on the site.
Naturally, one of my research projects was to
reproduce on WikiTree the family lines I had previously found to cross
over. I have successfully updated and sourced the connection between my
Dad’s tree and my Wife’s tree (http://danegenealogy. blogspot.com/2012/05/were-all- cousins-part-2.html)
so that both of our WikiTree family trees trace back to Richard Warren
and Elizabeth Walker of the Mayflower. Last night I started down the
track of verifying my Mom’s line back to Timothy Wheeler and Rebecca
Sayre (I’d already completed the path on my Dad’s
side).
I decided to start at Timothy and Rebecca and work
down since some of the profiles were already on WikiTree and just needed
to be sourced and the relationships linked. It didn’t take long to
work down to Joseph Dutton (http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/ Dutton-484),
his wife Rebecca Merriam (http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/ Merriam-263) and their daughter Rebecca Dutton. My process now is to do my research through my family tree on
http://www.Ancestry.com (where I can take advantage of Ancestry’s very useful hints and search functions), and supplement through http://www.Findagrave.com, and http://www.Google.com
searches. I was in the middle of putting
together the WikiTree profile for Rebecca Dutton when I started
noticing some worrying signs. The first and most obvious was that the town marriage record for
Joseph Dutton/Rebecca Merriam was dated 1685 while the
birth date I had for Rebecca Dutton was in 1679. Next
came the finding that the town birth record for Rebecca Dutton born in
1679 showed her father as Thomas Dutton Jr., not Joseph. Okay, so maybe
the data I had was wrong and my Rebecca was the one born in 1686. I didn't initially find the
town birth record,
just a “Millennium File” record, known in WikiTree circles to be
unreliable. I was getting very nervous, though and feeling like a lot
more research might be necessary to establish the connection. Then I
remembered that I had referenced the Findagrave.com
record for Joseph Dutton (http://www.findagrave.com/ cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid= 15211190)
to confirm his death date. On the Findagrave profile was a biography.
I tend not to give a lot of weight to these biographies, because so
often they are unsourced,
and this one was no exception, at least for the first half. But the
second half referred to Joseph Dutton’s will, and within the will,
importantly, to his daughter Rebeckah Gates. It also included a link to
the Findagrave memorial of Rebeckah (Dutton) Gates
1686-1749. All the pieces fell together, and it wasn’t good news:
Rebecca (Dutton) Millard (profile: http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Dutton-333), born in 1679, my ancestor, belonged on a
different family tree line than I had been led to believe. Her parents
were Thomas Dutton Jr. and his wife Rebeckah, not
Joseph Dutton and Rebecca Merriam. I've included a note on both profiles at WikiTree in the hope that no one else gets tripped up the same way. Rebecca (Dutton) Gates is here: (http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Dutton-258).
Naturally, I’m disappointed to find that my earlier
“research” was wrong. But a little more background that I didn’t tell
you was how I had found Rebecca Dutton Millard in the first place.
Well, it’s pretty simple, I found her by piggy-backing
on the family trees of other researchers that I found at Ancestry.com.
Ancestry.com makes it soooooo easy to do this. With the press of just a
couple of buttons, you can add the family trees from other researchers
right into your own, pulling in names, relationships,
dates and locations as you go. Eventually, I realized the error of my
ways in taking advantage of this method of expanding my trees, but
obviously not soon enough to avoid this kind of mistake. And while I am
sad about this “lost” connection, it helps to
cement the thoughts and feelings I’ve been having lately (http://danegenealogy. blogspot.com/2014/01/wikitree- and-genealogy-source-rigor. html)
that the genealogy
methods I’ve committed to on WikiTree are the ones that will help me avoid this kind
of error in the future, both for myself and for others who might rely
upon my work.
Alas, I’m going to have to re-establish my “We’re All Cousins” link between my Mom’s and my Dad’s family trees along some other family line. Looking on the bright side, though, I did do some digging into the Millards and found that it’s pretty likely my Mom is a cousin to President Millard Fillmore. I’m not going to say for sure, though, until I’ve documented and sourced all the profiles in between, though!
5 comments:
Hello Kyle, I too love the wikitree concept. Far too many people fall into the trap you describe on ancestry. It is clearly very important to check original resources but many just import trees resulting in a range of different and often unsourced ancestries for one person. The great thing about wikitree is that it forces collaboration where there are potential differences. I also love the DNA reporting on wikitree. I am very keen on genetic genealogy to 'validate" my paper research!
Veronica
Another great source that I like to use is FamilySearch.com. It is free and includes many of the US censuses and other databases that are great sources.
I am so glad to read this, because it makes me feel as though I am on the right track. Sometimes, when entering information into WikiTree, I think longingly of that simple and very tempting "click and add" method on Ancestry.com. Your post reminds me that the easier way is not necessarily the better way.
Thanks for this post. I look forward to reading more of your blog.
I'd like to be added to your family tree blogger's pinterest board. This is me: http://www.pinterest.com/lifestories2day
Thanks!
Hi Kyle, Sincere congratulations on finding the error in your tree. I have pruned three promising branches off my tree because of 'inconvenient' facts pointing to the lack of connection. I work in much same way as you do, between WikiTree and Ancestry, with some help from Find a Grave. Two resources I have come to depend on greatly this year are the New England Historical and Genealogical Society, better known as NEHGS, the best investment I ever made for my colonial ancestors, and the four volume "Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families by Douglas Richardson, which ties certain colonial families to the Magna Carta barons. Next I plan to do the DNA testing, and appreciate people on WikiTree who are ahead of me on that path. I enjoyed visiting your blog today - very informative. I'll be back for more.
Post a Comment